Knowledge and attitudes towards the use of artificial Intelligence for learning among health sciences students at Mildmay Institute of Health Sciences, Uganda

Authors

  • Mayimuna Nakidde Mildmay Institute Of Health Sciences School Of Allied
  • Hasifa Nansereko Mildmay Institute of Health Sciences
  • Dr. Jane Frank Nalubega Mildmay Institute Of Health Sciences School Of Allied , Mildmay Institute Of Health Sciences School of Nursing and Midwifery
  • Franscisco Ssemuwemba Mildmay Institute Of Health Sciences School Of Allied

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71020/ywtsnw72

Abstract

Background:

The study aims to assess knowledge and attitudes towards the use of artificial Intelligence for learning among health sciences students at Mildmay Institute of Health Sciences, Uganda

 

Methodology:

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The study was carried out at Mildmay Institute of Health Sciences. All students enrolled in Diploma or certificate courses at MIHS doing health-related programs during the data collection period were eligible to be part of our study population. Targeting. Student lists were stratified into cells based on program and year.

 

Results:

The majority of participants were female (53.6%, n=119). Over two-fifths (44.1%, n=98) were in Year 3 or above, while Year 1 and Year 2 students accounted for 24.3% (n=54) and 30.2% (n=67), respectively. Diploma in Clinical Medicine was the most represented program (54.9%, n=122), followed by Diploma in Nursing (22.5%, n=50) and Diploma in Midwifery (12.2%, n=27).  (86.0%, n=191) demonstrated adequate knowledge of AI tools for learning, scoring 3 or 4 out of 4. The mean knowledge score was 3.44 (SD=0.85). AI tools for understanding difficult topics, 86.5% (n=192) of students agreed or strongly agreed, while only 13.5% (n=30) disagreed or strongly disagreed. On confidence in using AI tools for learning, 72.1% (n=160) of students expressed agreement, though 27.9% (n=62) were neutral or unsure, suggesting some students remain hesitant in their practical engagement with AI tools. The most strongly endorsed item stated that AI tools can improve the quality of studies when used correctly; 86.5% (n=192) agreed or strongly agreed, including 70.3% (n=156) who strongly agreed.

 

Recommendations:

Address digital access inequities by supporting subsidized institutional AI tool subscriptions, improving internet access, and integrating AI infrastructure into national planning.

 

Conclusions:

These results highlight the absence of formal AI literacy education, clear institutional policies, and structured pedagogical support at MIHS.

References

Abid, A., Murugan, A., Banerjee, I., Purkayastha, S., Trivedi, H., & Gichoya, J. (2024). AI

education for fourth-year medical students: Two-Year experience of a web-based, self

guided curriculum and mixed methods study. JMIR Medical Education, 10, e46500.

https://doi.org/10.2196/46500

Ahsan, Z. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into medical education: A narrative

systematic review of current applications, challenges, and future directions. BMC

Medical Education, 25(1), 1187-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07744-0

Ajalo, E., Mukunya, D., Nantale, R., Kayemba, F., Pangholi, K., Babuya, J., Akuu, S. L.,

Namiiro, A. M., Nsubuga, Y. B., Mpagi, J. L., Musaba, M. W., Oguttu, F., Kuteesa, J.,

Mubuuke, A. G., Munabi, I. G., & Kiguli, S. (2025). Widespread use of ChatGPT and

other Artificial Intelligence tools among medical students in Uganda: A cross-sectional

study. PLOS ONE, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313776

Alqaissi, N., & Qtait, M. (2025). Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers regarding the

integration of artificial intelligence in nursing and health sciences education: A

systematic

review.

SAGE

Open

Nursing,

11,

23779608251374184.

https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251374185

Al-Qerem, W., Eberhardt, J., Jarab, A., Bawab, A. Q. A., Hammad, A., Alasmari, F., Alazab,

B., Husein, D. A., Alazab, J., & Al-Beool, S. (2023). Exploring knowledge, attitudes,

and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions’ students in

Jordan.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23(1), 288-.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02403-0

Amiri, H., Peiravi, S., Rezazadeh Shojaee, S. S., Rouhparvarzamin, M., Nateghi, M. N.,

Etemadi, M. H., ShojaeiBaghini, M., Musaie, F., Anvari, M. H., & Asadi Anar, M.

(2024). Medical, dental, and nursing students’ attitudes and knowledge towards

artificial intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical

Education, 24(1), 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05406-1

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L.

(2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and

behavioral

research:

a

primer.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Frontiers

in

Public

Health,

6.

Boyacı, H., & Söyük, S. (2025). Healthcare workers’ readiness for artificial intelligence and

organizational change: A quantitative study in a university hospital. BMC Health

Services Research, 25(1), 813-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12846-y

36

Buabbas, A. J., Miskin, B., Alnaqi, A. A., Ayed, A. K., Shehab, A. A., Syed-Abdul, S., &

Uddin, M. (2023). Investigating students’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence in

medical education. Healthcare, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091298

Busch, F., Hoffmann, L., Truhn, D., Ortiz-Prado, E., Makowski, M. R., Bressem, K. K.,

Adams, L. C., & COMFORT Consortium. (2024). Global cross-sectional student

survey on AI in medical, dental, and veterinary education and practice at 192 faculties.

BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1066. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06035-4

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods

Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage. - References. (n.d.). Scientific

Research

Publishing.

https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1964849

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and

Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. - References. (n.d.). Scientific Research

Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3491413

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods

Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE. - References. (n.d.). Scientific Research

Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2697821

Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare.

Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of

information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Emmanuel, O. (2023). ASSESING FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PREVALENCE OF

ANEMIA AMONG CHILDREN UNDER FIVE YEARS OF AGE IN PAEDIATRIC

WARD AT LIRA REGIONAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL. A DESCRIPTIVE CROSS

SECTIONAL

STUDY.

[Students

Journal

of

Health

Research

Africa].https://sjhresearchafrica.org/index.php/public

html/article/download/382/337/2344

El-Banna, M. M., Sajid, M. R., Rizvi, M. R., Sami, W., & McNelis, A. M. (2025). AI literacy

and competency in nursing education: Preparing students and faculty members for an

AI-enabled future-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 12,

1681784. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1681784

37

European commission. (2024). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Shaping Europe’s Digital

Future.

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy

ai

Eysenbach, G., & Wyatt, J. (2002). Using the Internet for surveys and health research. Journal

of Medical Internet Research, 4(2), E13. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13

Feigerlova, E., Hani, H., & Hothersall-Davies, E. (2025). A systematic review of the impact of

artificial intelligence on educational outcomes in health professions education. BMC

Medical Education, 25(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06719-5

Issa, W. B., Shorbagi, A., Al-Sharman, A., Rababa, M., Al-Majeed, K., Radwan, H., Ahmed,

F. R., Al-Yateem, N., Mottershead, R., Abdelrahim, D. N., Hijazi, H., Khasawneh, W.,

Ali, I., Abbas, N., & Fakhry, R. (2024). Shaping the future: Perspectives on the

Integration of Artificial Intelligence in health profession education: A multi-country

survey. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1166-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024

06076-9

Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang,

Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and

Vascular Neurology, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101

Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang,

Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and

Vascular Neurology, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101

Kotecha, D., Asselbergs, F. W., Achenbach, S., Anker, S. D., Atar, D., Baigent, C., Banerjee,

A., Beger, B., Brobert, G., Casadei, B., Ceccarelli, C., Cowie, M. R., Crea, F., Cronin,

M., Denaxas, S., Derix, A., Fitzsimons, D., Fredriksson, M., Gale, C. P., … Grobbee,

D. E. (2022). CODE-EHR best-practice framework for the use of structured electronic

health-care records in clinical research. The Lancet Digital Health, 4(10), e757–e764.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00151-0

Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., Leon, L. D., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M.,

Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of

ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language

models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198

Launiala, A. (2009). How much can a KAP survey tell us about people’s knowledge, attitudes

and practices? Some observations from medical anthropology research on malaria in

pregnancy

in

Malawi.

https://doi.org/10.22582/am.v11i1.31

Anthropology

Matters,

11(1).

38

Li, Q., & Qin, Y. (2023). AI in medical education: Medical student perception, curriculum

recommendations and design suggestions. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 852-.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04700-8

Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial

intelligence.

Journal

of

Consumer

Research,

46(4),

629–650.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013

Ma, Q. (2005, January 1). The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical

findings.

IGI

Global

Scientific

Publishing.

https://www.igi

global.com/gateway/chapter/4475

Masters, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence in medical education. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 976

980. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1595557

Matheny, M., Thadaney, S., & Beam, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in health care: The

hope, the hype, the promise, the peril. NAM. https://nam.edu/publications/artificial

intelligence-in-health-care-the-hope-the-hype-the-promise-the-peril/

Mousavi Baigi, S. F., Sarbaz, M., Ghaddaripouri, K., Ghaddaripouri, M., Mousavi, A. S., &

Kimiafar, K. (2023). Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence

among healthcare students: A systematic review. Health Science Reports, 6(3), e1138.

https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1138

Mukunya, D., Nantale, R., Paungholi, K., Epuitai, J., Kayemba, F., Jemba, B., Ajalo, E.,

Afodun, A., Musaba, M. W., Munabi, I. G., Kiguli, S., & Mubuuke, A. G. (2025). “I

can no longer give take-home exams”: Health professionals educators’ experiences and

perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in health professions education

in Uganda. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1361-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909

025-07933-x

Munos, M. K., Blanc, A. K., Carter, E. D., Eisele, T. P., Gesuale, S., Katz, J., Marchant, T.,

Stanton, C. K., Campbell, H., & Improving Coverage Measurement Group. (2018).

Validation studies for population-based intervention coverage indicators: Design,

analysis,

and

interpretation.

Journal of Global Health, 8(2), 020804.

https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.020804

Murphy, K., Ruggiero, E. D., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., Malhotra,

N., Lui, V., & Gibson, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence for good health: A scoping

review of the ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 14-.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8

39

Okolo, C. T., Aruleba, K., & Obaido, G. (2023, January 1). Responsible AI in Africa—

challenges

and

opportunities.

Springer

International

Publishing.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_3

Oladipo, E. K. (2024). Impact and challenges of artificial intelligence integration in the African

health sector: a review. https://tmr.scione.com/cms/fulltext.php?id=144

Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation:

an attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and

Ergonomics

Society,

52(3),

381–410.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055 Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (2017) Nursing

Research Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 10th Edition,

Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, 784 p. - References. (n.d.). Scientific Research

Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2325091

Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England

Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1814259

Sami, A., Tanveer, F., Sajwani, K., Kiran, N., Javed, M. A., Ozsahin, D. U., Muhammad, K.,

& Waheed, Y. (2025). Medical students’ attitudes toward AI in education: Perception,

effectiveness,

and

its

credibility.

BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 82.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06704-y

Sapci, A. H. (2020). Artificial intelligence education and tools for medical and health

informatics students: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Education, 6(1).

https://doi.org/10.2196/19285

Seneviratne, T., Kodikara, K., Abeykoon, I., & Palpola, W. (2025). Perception of medical

undergraduates on artificial intelligence in medical education: Qualitative exploration.

JMIR Medical Education, 11, e73798. https://doi.org/10.2196/73798

Santos, D. P. dos, Giese, D., Brodehl, S., Chon, S. H., Staab, W., Kleinert, R., Maintz, D., &

Baeßler, B. (2018). Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: A

multicentre

survey.

European

Radiology,

29(4),

1640–1646.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1

Shaw, K., Henning, M. A., & Webster, C. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in medical

education: A scoping review of the evidence for efficacy and future directions. Medical

Science Educator, 35(3), 1803–1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02373-0

Shishehgar, S., Murray-Parahi, P., Alsharaydeh, E., Mills, S., & Liu, X. (2025). Artificial

intelligence in health education and practice: A systematic review of health students’

40

and academics’ knowledge, perceptions and experiences. International Nursing

Review, 72(2), e70045. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70045

Srinivasu, P. N., Sandhya, N., Jhaveri, R. H., & Raut, R. (n.d.). From blackbox to explainable

AI in healthcare: existing tools and case studies. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1).

https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8167821

Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial

intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300

7

Tung, A. Y. Z., & Dong, L. W. (2023). Malaysian medical students’ attitudes and readiness

toward AI (artificial intelligence): A cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical

Education

and

Curricular

Development,

10,

23821205231201164.

https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231201164

Vasudevan, R., Alqahtani, T., Alqahtani, S., Devanandan, P., Kandasamy, G., Saad, R., Amer,

A., Abduallah, R., Waleed, G., Hasan, R., & Ahmed, L. (2025). Integrating AI in

healthcare education: Attitudes of pharmacy students at King Khalid University

towards using ChatGPT in clinical decision-making. Healthcare, 13(11).

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13111265

Vojdani, S., Najibi, S. M., Niknam, B., Daneshfard, B., Salehi-Marzijarani, M., Azgomi, R. N.

D., & Hashempur, M. H. (n.d.). Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of

Iranian medical students toward complementary and alternative medicine: a cross

sectional survey. Health Science Reports, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70539

WHO. (2021, June 28). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. World Health

Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200

Wobo, K. N., Nnamani, I. O., Alinnor, E. A., Gabriel-Job, N., & Paul, N. (2025). Medical

students’ perception of the use of artificial intelligence in medical education.

International

Journal

of

Research in Medical Sciences, 13(1), 82–89.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20244099

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

Issue

Section

Section of orginal Peer-reviewed articles

How to Cite

Knowledge and attitudes towards the use of artificial Intelligence for learning among health sciences students at Mildmay Institute of Health Sciences, Uganda. (2026). Journal of World Health Research, 3(11), 15. https://doi.org/10.71020/ywtsnw72

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2